
"It can cause autism, cancer and Alzheimer's; just eat fruit and vegetables to stay healthy!"
There are needles and pharmaceutical companies involved (and many people think that antibiotics kill viruses), so maybe I shouldn't be too surprised to encounter sentiments like the above. But people can get so emotional about vaccines! The specter of mandated vaccination terrifies far more effectively than does the H1N1 virus. Is this fear justified?
More... For the purposes of this post, lets say that you are weighing the risks of getting vaccinated. From your point of view, it may well seem like you are faced with a choice: a risk of a 'natural' disease; or a scary needle combined with a risk of an 'unnatural' disease. But let's zoom out, and put things in perspective.
Infectious and parasitic diseases are collectively responsible for the deaths of a huge majority of the humans that have ever walked the Earth (malaria alone has killed about half of us). If pathogens could be seen, we would recoil from them with more disgust than we do from the sight of any snake or spider. According to Wikipedia, they account for over 19% of the modern annual death rate, which is second only to cardiovascular disease, and leaves autism, Alzheimer's, and even cancer in the dust. They are caused by organisms which mutate and evolve rapidly, making them dangerously volatile and hard to contain. Even on battlefields, where people have done their darnedest to kill each other, infectious diseases have tended to do a much better job of it. If we really want to survive and thrive as a species, we need to put serious effort into controlling these parasites by doing whatever we can to limit their room to spread, and thus mutate, evolve, and possibly become more virulent.
"But it's only the flu"? Hmm.
On the other hand, you have the vaccine. An important first point is that the H1N1 influenza vaccine, although it is being administered separately, differs very little from the usual yearly 'flu shot', which itself needs to be varied slightly year to year. The influenza vaccine has been in use since the end of WWII. Vaccines have allowed us to eradicate or corner terrible diseases like small pox and polio. And what they haven't done is leave a legacy of mercury poisoning and cancer. Vaccines are arguably mankind's single most important medical advance. Ever. Untold thousands are alive today because of them. Like anything that actually does anything to you medically speaking, they may cause allergic reactions or other complications; they are not risk-free. But the vast majority of the accusations leveled at vaccines are just the result of a public lack of: scientific understanding; trust in government; and love of needles. Get informed, and weigh the risk against the alternative risk of not only becoming infected, but also of possibly infecting someone else, who then infects someone else, and so on.
If you are still choosing to forgo personal vaccination, then at least consider the ethical implications of the anti-vaccine hype. By choosing not to be vaccinated, a person risks communicating the flu to a vulnerable second party and allows the virus "room" to evolve. This is not just like deciding not to wear a bike helmet; your decision impacts others. And think before you try to change the choices of those around you! Are you really saying that those suffering from swine flu brought it upon themselves by neglecting their greens? Be careful; blame shifts with responsibility! And might not they neglect vaccination, for fear of being seen by you to pad the pockets of the evil drug companies? Are the people who look up to you having their choice made for them?
(A special thanks to Dr B. And apologies for my liberal use of the word "organisms" )
Hey Nathan - good post. The amount of misinformation (and disinformation) surrounding vaccines is scary in itself, and the hysteria that "vaccines cause autism" is infuriating.
ReplyDeleteYou might be interested in checking out, if you haven't already, the article "Why We Immunize" over on Making Light. (www.nielsenhayden.com/makinglight/archives/010978.html)
Thanks Liz! I agree! Great article!
ReplyDeleteI'm not convinced, mate. The mortality rates of both the flu and H1N1 virus don't justify injecting yourself with Thimerosal. I understand that the majority of deaths occurred in patients with already compromised immune systems.
ReplyDeleteI don't disagree that vaccinations have rid the western world of some nasty diseases, but taking a flu vaccination every year because vaccinations worked for Polio seems like faulty logic.
Furthermore, there's no guarantee that the flu strands the pharmaceutical companies select for their cocktail will even arrive from Asia to infect the population.
I think it's funny that pro-vacinators often accuse anti-vaccinators that they are somehow against "science". It seems like that accusation is as guilty of a blantant dismissal as it describes the anti-vaccinators are guilty of.
Good points Richard! You rule. And you're right: influenza mortality RATES are low; Polio and the flu are not the same (I don't think we will be rid of the flu any time soon!); there is no guarantee the vaccine will work (it mutates so fast, they have to guess); and people sure let fly at each other from across such moral divides.
ReplyDeleteHOWEVER,in my post, I tried to emphasize the volatile and contagious nature of the flu. This is important because when taken into consideration, it casts new light on your arguments:
"I'm healthy; I don't need a flu shot", right?But hold on! Who communicated the virus to those "patients with already compromised immune systems" who aren't so lucky? Chances are, it was some healthy young person like yourself. Vaccination is NOT all about personal protection. I think that that's a mentality we really have to change.
Polio is not the flu, but the logic IS sound: EVERY infected host represents a great number of opportunities for the disease to not only spread, but to evolve. The Spanish flu of 1918 was at first rather mild until the chaos of the end of WW1 allowed it to mutate and come back in a second wave that killed HUGE numbers of (young, healthy) people: EVERY potential host we can deny to influenza (or polio) helps ALL of us.
Additionally, while we cannot secure guarantees that the flu shot will work this year or any year, there is evidence that they have helped historically. And regarding Thimerosal, I included a link to a Skeptoid podcast/transcript (click "mercury poisoning") on the subject that I recommend. (See methyl- versus ethyl- mercury.) Let me know what you think, mate!
A couple of thoughts...
ReplyDeleteYour comment "If we really want to survive and thrive as a species..." Does this mean we should ignore natural methods of population control? Are we as a species really going to be able to 'thrive' if we allow current population growth rates to continue?
Should we really be treating this latest outbreak as a 'pandemic' as so much of the media would want us to believe that it is?
In comparing the death toll of this latest outbreak to the Spanish flu it is obvious that we can not make that comparison (nor can we in the case of the outbreak of the swine flu last year).
As an aside, here at UVic, I find it exceedingly comical that when you log-in to any computer on campus, it comes up with a little powerpoint presentation on how swine flu mitigation (fair enough, there was an outbreak at UofW in Seattle)... That said, everyone just hits escape to skip it. So in my mind, when swine flu hits campus, everyone is going to be infected by repeated pressing of the escape button...
sorry to be so brief...
Lauren
Haha! Yes - use your pen to hit that button! The irony would be too great! :)
ReplyDeleteWell, Lauren, first off, I put it to you that the single best correlation that you can possibly draw between a low population growth and some other factor, is EDUCATION, not the prevalence of disease. Witness the "developed" versus the "developing" countries. So I certainly think we should ignore the flu, a far less humane AND far less effective alternative, as a way to control population.
Secondly; yes. The World Health Organization has classified it as a pandemic, not the media. THEY just try to scare the hell out of you regardless. Just be aware, and wash your hands - why not?
Thirdly, I mentioned the Spanish flu merely to illustrate the danger of mutation (H1N1 IS a variation of the very same type of virus that caused it). The prospect of the same thing reoccurring today IS a real danger. We ARE much better equipped to handle it now than we were back then, but there are also far more people to protect. But you are right; the death tolls are incomparable.
And lastly, that's okay, L - just write more next time!
Swine flu protest/proof that your blog warrants more Eastern European attention (they're just so darn good at protesting these days):
ReplyDeletehttp://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthpicturegalleries/6531682/H1N1-fever-Swine-flu-masks-in-Ukraine-and-around-the-world.html
Haha! That IS some of the best protesting I've ever seen. I for one completely agree with them depite the fact I've no idea what their beef is.
ReplyDeleteThey were protesting that the swine flu epidemic is being used to stir up fear among Ukrainians ahead of the January presidential election.
ReplyDeleteOh! Thanks for clearing that up! I keep meaning to blog about H1N1 disinformation to accompany this one on the vaccine. Do you think their beef is legit?
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteA great info graphic regarding vaccines:
ReplyDeletehttp://blogs-images.forbes.com/matthewherper/files/2013/02/c6fb5feb7f1ee71b7e725277d3099916.jpg