"Uh, excuse me?", said the young woman, her voice echoing off the tiles.
"Yes?", I said, turning toward her.
"You're bleeding", she said. I looked down and saw a small trickle of blood running down my leg from a small, mysterious cut on my knee.
"Oh! So I am!", I said, surprised. Then, noting the insignificance of the cut, and not wanting to immediately leave the comfort of the steam-room to address it, I looked at her and asked "do you mind?"
A familiar chuckle came from the back of the room.
A familiar chuckle came from the back of the room.
"No", said the woman. Then she added, "but it's not going to stop bleeding if you stay in here."
"Really?", I said quickly, and watched her expression for clues that maybe she knew something that I didn't. But the woman looked at me with surprise, as if it was common knowledge that blood won't clot in the steam-room. Then she shrugged and went back to talking with her boyfriend, apparently leaving me to bleed to death, had I so chosen.
I immediately suspected that the young woman was under the impression that blood clots because the air 'dries it out', in much the same way that the toothpaste in the tip of the uncapped tube becomes hard and crusty. This is because I had long assumed the same thing; and only while taking a course in cell biology did I discover that blood-clots actually form in response to blood vessel damage. So a cut should stop bleeding at approximately the same rate regardless of humidity. (Of course, this helps explain how it is that blood-clots can sometimes form internally.)
But the woman didn't seem eager to pursue the subject any further, so I kept my mouth shut. It was easy for me to do this, because as a regular in the steam-room I get lots of practice. For example, it is common steam-room wisdom that exposure to the heat and steam bestows significant health benefits. I certainly find the steam-room relaxing, but am I really relaxing my way to health and longevity?
Heat: The Cure for All Disease?
Allegedly, the ancient Greek philosopher Hippocrates once said " give me the power to create a fever and I shall cure any disease"; people in the steam-room sometimes say that they are there "sweating out a cold"; and those in the steam-room/sauna business will sometimes attempt to convince you that steam-rooms and saunas will help you to "stay free of disease".
Actually, at first all this made perfect sense to me: after all, fevers are a wonderful defensive mechanism that can at once help to slow the reproduction of invading pathogens (like the flu virus) and enhance your body's capacity to combat infections. So it intuitively follows that if you warm yourself in a sauna, you are effectively making your body temporarily less habitable for any pathogenic viruses or bacteria that may have just begun to colonize you.
But now I wonder if I wasn't too quick to assume that a fever and a sauna both effect my body in the same way. For example, during a fever, your body increases its core temperature by shunting blood away from your skin and toward your internal organs; whereas in a sauna, your body is still actively trying to maintain its normal internal temperature (about 37 degrees C), and one of the ways it does this is to shunt blood in the exact opposite direction: away from your internal organs and toward your skin (this is accomplished by the selective contraction of blood vessels - very cool). Moreover, during an actual fever your body will do more than just cook: for example, it will also produce elevated quantities of "interferon" (proteins that "interfere" with the reproduction of viral DNA). I'm no doctor, but all this makes me very suspicious of claims that a sauna effectively induces an artificial fever.
(Another thing I'd like to get off my chest is that going to a public sauna when you know you are sick is probably not the most responsible move you could make.)
Toxic Sweat?
Repeatedly I hear it asserted that sweating in the sauna helps remove "toxins" from the skin. But there are two small problems with this assertion: the first is that sweating does not actually cleanse your body of toxins; and the second is that the toxins do not really exist.
Interestingly, only mammals sweat; and most mammals don't sweat nearly as much as we humans do. Less sweaty or sweat-less animals (like reptiles, pigs, and whales for examples) seem to get by just fine without being able to "cleanse" their skin by perspiring appreciably. So when you think about it, why should sweat glands do anything more than cool us, when our bodies can rid themselves of waste in the same way that these animals so effectively can?
Considering this, it is unsurprising that sweating doesn't actually cleanse your body of too much more than water and water-soluble substances like electrolytes.
Considering this, it is unsurprising that sweating doesn't actually cleanse your body of too much more than water and water-soluble substances like electrolytes.
In any case, the term "toxin", although it is a scientific term, is used improperly here, as it all too often is. This is important to realize, because none of the substances that I assume people are referring to when they say "toxin" (namely "metabolites"; "heavy metals" like mercury and lead; bacteria; viruses; and "free radicals") are eliminated in significant quantities via perspiration. Furthermore, terms like "toxins" or "detoxification" are worth watching out for, as their ambiguity makes them irresistibly attractive to the unwittingly ignorant and the willfully deceptive alike.
Steam-Rumors?
What about the steam? Is it any good for your sinuses or lungs?
Again, my impression is that, although steam inhalation may be a suitable measure in certain medical cases, it's effect on healthy individuals is more or less negligible; and, again, there appears to be little evidence that it will be of much use to those suffering from a cold. All I feel comfortable venturing beyond that is that there doesn't seem to be much in the way of non-anecdotal evidence that regular steam inhalation is particularly healthful, generally speaking. But if you have a symptom that you think a little steam would help alleviate (say, a cough) why not try it? Even better: ask a doctor.
* * *
Because I enjoy spending time in the steam-room, it would be fantastic if it also proved to be the key to an especially long and vigorous life. But unfortunately I have yet to be convinced that there is even a single substantial health benefit, beyond relaxation, directly associated with my steam-room habit. So when I see guys attempting to coax their reluctant girlfriends into the steam-room, or parents their children, with flippant promises that it will improve their health in some way, I often wonder how much thought preceded their statement.
(While I'm at it, there doesn't seem to be much evidence that you should compel yourself or others to follow a steam or sauna with an ice-cold shower or swim either, however invigorating or macho it may be to do so.)
Although these might, at first, seem like distinctly unimportant issues (after all, what's the harm in believing that your local rec center will admit you to the fountain of youth for only two dollars on week nights?), it should be appreciated that these opinions necessarily accompany mistaken assumptions about the way our bodies work, like the idea that sweat cleanses our bodies significantly, or that such things as "toxins" exist and must be consciously dealt with. And it can be really nice to know these things aren't true, especially when you don't like saunas or steam-rooms, or other alleged "detox" methods like the master cleanse (further discussed in this post), or mud-bathing.

Korean culture is all about the sweating, wether by eating "warming" chicken ginseng or dog soup in the summertime or paying weekly visits to the neighborhood sauna house. In the bathhouse sections, people spend a lot of time scrubbing themselves down with rough clothes which I imagine is probably good for the circulation, if not just for getting very very clean ... I myself was partial to jumping back and forth between hot tubs, saunas and ice cold pools and I always left feeling both relaxed and invigorated ... seems to me that getting the circulation going like that must count for something? ... Once in a while it was not uncommon to see women enjoying the saunas and hot tubs wrapped in mini shower curtains in order to lose weight faster. This I do not know about.
ReplyDelete... geez, what with this and fan death we could probably dismantle the entire society.
Thanks for the comment, Katbird! Haha - maybe we could!(...um... "dog soup"? That makes you sweat?)
ReplyDeleteAnd you are right to be skeptical of the shower-curtain method: you sweat water not fat. Maybe that's why these awesome pants never caught on:
http://tinyurl.com/6ocrsx
Regarding blood circulation: it's certainly a worthy goal. But, as far as I know, the massage and accompanying exercise are probably more effective than the heat and steam in terms of promoting general blood flow. This is because the contraction of your leg and arm muscles, etc, will help to slosh blood around inside you; whereas in a sauna(if you're just sitting there), your circulation is still depending almost exclusively on the efforts of your heart. After all, the heat won't pump blood for you!
That said, I have to go too far out of my comfort zone to thoroughly investigate every little possible benefit that a sauna or steam might possibly provide; and it seems that there is still a little room for speculation.
But I think it's fair for me to say that much of this speculation is probably just wishful thinking; and that those who make grand claims about the health benefits of steam-rooms and saunas must either know less about all this than I do, or much, much more.
It's great to see a post that pushes back against the argument that anything I enjoy must be good for me, and so should also be good for everybody, so everybody should be required to do the things that I enjoy (classical music makes people smarter right?).
ReplyDeleteTwo questions for you. I had always heard that the value of bouncing between steam and cold water is that the steam opens up your pores so that dirt could escape and the cold water seals the pores before new dirt can find its way back in. Any thoughts if there is any merit to that theory or just a nice sounding story?
And the obvious question: did your cut clot in the steam?
Well put, Steven. Thanks. By the way, did you find the "hidden track" at the end of my post on music?
ReplyDeleteGood questions, both. In order:
1) I'm no dermatologist, so I'll assume for argument's sake that dirt gets into your pores, and that steam helps release it by opening them. I hear this ALL the time, too, and there seems to be at least an element truth to it, insofar as sweat pores DO apparently open in response to heat; and it follows that cold would have the opposite effect.
But I'm going to put up a fight against the cold water follow-up. Just splashing your face is one thing, but in the post I was referring more to the practice of taking an ice-cold shower, or jumping into the ocean or a lake. This is going to do more than just close your pores: it's going to shock your body (a constant internal temperature is very important to your well-being). But for some reason many people seem to think it's a healthy thing to do, probably because, like you said, they enjoy it. Plus, there's the machismo appeal - not to be underestimated.
Also: how long does cold water really keep your pores closed for? How much dirt would have gotten inside them otherwise? Is the dirt making you unhealthy? Or ugly? And for what it's worth, I still get pimples all the time, and I'm one of the macho guys who likes the cold shower.
Overall this strikes me as one of those "nice-sounding" philosophies that treats the body like a car, which must be thoroughly cleaned lest performance-effecting grime accumulate (hence ear-candling, cleanses, and enimas). Of course, this doesn't mean it doesn't help, but even IF it does, I highly doubt the necessity.
2) Yes. I made sure of it.
(Part 1)
ReplyDeleteIt sure is refreshing to read a post from someone that bothers to stop and think about the science before they irresponsibly just repeat something they've heard!
I felt the need to respond to such a well thought out post. As a seller of saunas and steamrooms for nearly 30 years, I feel qualified to tell you that you're spot on with your comments and musings.
The liver and kidneys are what removes any "toxins" from the body, and your point is well taken regarding the issue of blood flow.
I'm surprised, though, that you didn't touch on the biggest myth of all (though a commenter did) - that of weight loss.
The market is flooded with these cheap phony so-called "infrared" saunas from China, and some companies selling these are making ridiculously wild claims about being able to burn 600 to 800 calories in 20 minutes of sitting on your bum in one of their saunas.
Using a sauna to quickly drop a few pounds is downright dangerous, because what's lost is water and electrolytes. It's called dehydration, and it can be life threatening! We always follow a sauna or steam with a healthy beverage and a light salty snack.
I'd like to make two interesting points regarding blood flow, though. Our bodies have "spare" blood that goes to where it's needed. Eat a large meal, and it goes to the gut. Spend some time thinking about a particularly complex problem, and it goes to the brain.
As you've noted, in a sauna, due to the body's effort to cool itself, this extra blood is shunted to muscular tissue, not just of the extremities, but of the trunk of the body as well. In the case of a muscular injury, inflammation restricts blood flow to the injured tissue, and that works against healing.
I've suffered back injuries that aspirin could not touch - until I entered the steamroom. Then it was like Lourdes! The increased blood flow to the injured tissue helped transport the aspirin, the aspirin started to reduce the inflammation, and the effect was like a cascade. I recommend a sauna or steambath for anyone with muscular injuries.
(Part 2)
ReplyDeleteI'll take issue a bit with your point regarding elevated body temperature. It's not like part of the blood in the body has an elevated temperature and part does not.
Sure, you've got all that "extra" blood away from the organs, but the blood that's in the core of the body is still hotter than normal. That has to be at least annoying to any microbial critters attempting to colonize your tissues.
In the past, people with cardiac issues were warned to avoid the use of sauna or steam, but the medical community is reassessing that advice. Pulse rate is increased and some have pointed out that for a person with physical issues, it's sort of a "low impact" way to exercise your circulatory system.
And as for benefits to the skin, you can't argue with all those beautiful Scandinavian women that will swear that they maintain soft supple skin by regular sauna bathing. I can't easily discount the logic that says that profuse sweating will help keep the skin more hydrated, and no one will argue that this isn't a good thing.
Then there's the whole issue of mental therapy. If someone says that a sauna or steam helps with their mental attitude, then it helps with their mental attitude. You can't argue with their assertion. It's sort of self-fulfilling. It's their attitude!
And, by the way, I've never heard that a wound won't close in a sauna or steambath, but I suppose it might make sense, considering the increased blood flow that's likely to exist at the injured area. Perhaps it would be more appropriate to say that it simply would take longer for a wound to clot in a sauna or steambath.
Now, if you'll permit a shameless plug, I'd like to invite your readers to visit our web site, where you can find a nearly limitless selection of sauna and steamroom products, as well as nearly three decades of experience and knowledge plus the most competitive pricing...
http://www.almostheaven.net
Keep up the great posting!
Thanks for the thoughts and comments, Art! Appreciated! In light of them I have decided to tolerate the plug.
ReplyDeleteRegarding part 2:
Good point about blood flow, but whether or not the heat 'annoys' pathogens (which I admit is theoretically possible), my goal was to show that claims that saunas/steamrooms can help keep you 'free of disease' are actually rather far-fetched. What's more, as far as I can tell, they are unsubstantiated by actual evidence.
Plus, I'll have you know that I have yet to meet the woman I can't argue with, and Scandinavians are no exception! Are they really so much more 'soft' and 'supple' than women from other regions? If anything, it seems more plausible that saunas simply help you shed skin cells, and thus temporarily bestow a slightly more youthful appearance. In any case, my own ugliness flies in their face: as a regular steam-bather who is periodically deprived, I can't say that I have noticed an effect on my skin whatsoever.
And I agree that if someone likes saunas, then that's great for them. But so many people go further and (as noted by Steven) assume that that means that it's good for everyone. I think the word 'therapy' is unfortunate for this reason, as it can imply that the act is therapeutic, rather than the enjoyment. And there can be a big difference.
I hope to hear more from you, Art! Good luck with sales!
Well, now. I would have to assume that you're a bachelor, if you've never met a woman with whom you could not argue. Please excuse the chauvinism, but any married man will tell you that, for certain, the one woman with whom they cannot argue is their wife!
ReplyDeleteSeriously, though, perhaps it is indeed the exfoliation promoted by the sauna to which softer skin can be attributed. I know women that insist that their skin dries when they are deprived of their sauna.
I will not purport that the common perception of the general beauty of Scandinavian women is thanks to a sauna. It probably has more to do with the fact that they kidnapped all the prettiest girls when they raided other lands in ancient times.
I will say, though, that you cannot argue with anyone that tells you that their sauna is therapeutic, at least mentally therapeutic. It's self-fulfilling. Sort of like a placebo effect, or that "positive thinking" that's all the rage these days (if you want your sauna to be therapeutic, think of it as being that way, and it will be!).
If you find an inner peace from sauna bathing, then you find an inner peace, much like meditating. No one can argue with that. It's your inner peace!
And as with anything mentally therapeutic, there are typical physical benefits. Mental well being often translates to physical well being (and vice versa).
So even if I can produce no proof about any particular physiological effects that are therapeutic in the sauna, the anecdotal evidence (and my own personal experience) bears it out.
Actually, there was one study I recall from many years by a cardiologist that showed that sauna bathing could improve the compromised circulatory function in patients with that problem. I wish I could relocate the source. It was back before the internet, that's how long ago it was.
It would not surprise me that there are some other studies, probably obscure, probably in Scandinavia, but I'm sure you'll agree that it is kind of difficult to prove a therapeutic benefit that's not easily measured (the way that circulatory function is, for example). How would you accurately measure an improved immune response or softer skin?
Anyway, keep up the great blogging!
Lucky guess re: my marital status. :) Also, I too think that the kidnapping of pretty girls is probably the likelier root cause of the perception of Scandinavian beauty. hehe. (it's funny because it was a long time ago.)
ReplyDeleteI like your newest comment because it reassures me that I am headed in the right direction with my posts - my latest being on the misuse of the word 'therapy' and an approaching one on the placebo effect. Hopefully, these will combine to form a more adequate response to your excellent points, which I think deserve to be treated at length.
Here, I will only mention that, once again, you seem to have underestimated my ability to get into an argument! For example, if someone claimed that cigarette smoking was "therapeutic", it seems a lot sillier doesn't it? I mean, they are still putting themselves at risk of developing lung cancer - among other things - no matter how much "inner peace" the act gives them.
By this I mean to point out that mental well-being can affect physical well-being, granted, but it does not equal physical well-being. Therefore, I can and would absolutely argue with anyone who says that a sauna is 'therapeutic' for them in lieu of any non-anecdotal supporting evidence.
However, if somebody simply said that they "enjoy" smoking - or the sauna or steam-room - I would have no problem with that. It is probably an entirely accurate statement, and at least it is one that doesn't imply that it is the act, rather than the resulting enjoyment, that is beneficial.
Also, I take issue with the description of "softer skin" as a possible "therapeutic benefit". Remember - health and beauty are not one and the same Art! (Otherwise, I would be forever immune to any and all disease.)
Thanks for the comments and compliments! Keep it up!
I really love going to saunas and steam-rooms. Thanks a lot for sharing your insights.
ReplyDeleteback pain chicago